Fri 6 Jan 2012
Depression and Masculinity: It’s time to do some serious rethinking on both subjects
Posted by Mathew Block under Articles, Main, Theological Musings
[4] Comments
Some of you will be aware of Converge Magazine, a Vancouver-based magazine that tackles questions of faith and culture. If you haven’t picked up a copy yet, now’s the time to do so. The current issue features an article not only by me, but also one by my very good friend Karl Persson.
Karl Persson on Depression
Persson’s article “Depression and Faith in the Life of the (Post)Modern Church” (pp. 38-41) is the best thing I have ever read on the subject. He criticizes the two major approaches to depression visible in the Church today before suggesting a third way, better than the others.
The first response to depression that he examines arises out of modernism, and basically ignores the problem. For these Christians, the Good News of salvation is so wonderful that they simply cannot conceive that a Christian could ever be sad again. Persson describes this response well: “Many churches… mistake the appearance of happiness for the truth of Christian joy, and so are not comfortable with Christians who disturb this appearance.” As a result, these Christians take the easy way out, and simply avoid the question altogether. They must either pretend depression does not exist or give up their idea that the Christian must always be happy and victorious over sin and sorrow. They are unwilling to give up that idea; and so they ignore depression.
By contrast, the emergent movement and the postmodernism from which it arises is more than willing to talk about subjects like depression. But because it has abandoned the concept of “covenant “in favour of “honesty,” it lacks shared stories in which to interpret hurt. Evil and pain are recognized for what they are, but without the context of real community (with the church present and past through our shared history), it leads inevitably to cynicism. Depression is real for them, and its destructive power is absolute.
Persson suggests we need to temper one approach with the other. Yes, we need to focus on the “happily ever after” that comes with faith in Christ; but we cannot ignore the very real pain at work in this world. The Church must embrace those that are hurting, and let them share vicariously in the joy of salvation even if they cannot feel such joy themselves.
But I’ve written too much already. You simply must read the article; it’s incredibly important.
Mathew Block on Masculinity
The same issue of Converge Magazine includes an article by me entitled “The Man God Hasn’t Called You to Be: What the Christian masculinity movement keeps getting wrong” (pp. 32-33). I won’t bother to go into too much detail here, but let me summarize it in this way: for nearly a hundred and fifty years, the Church has embraced a concept of masculinity that glorifies battle and warfare. “If you are to be a real man,” we seem to say, “then you must be at your core a warrior.” I take that idea head-on in this article, suggesting it has more to do with our wider culture’s aggressive understanding of masculinity than with the biblical witness. We are not called to be warriors, I argue; instead, like Adam before us, we are called to be gardeners.
Consider it a declaration of war on warrior-masculinity.
Converge Magazine
So what exactly is Converge Magazine, and why does it publish such fasinating articles? Well, here’s how it self-describes:
Ever wish there was a magazine that addressed issues of faith and culture but didn’t come off as ultra fabricated and cheesy? Well Converge magazine just might be your answer. We’re a faith based magazine for young people in their 20′s and 30′s. Our magazine comes out six times a year covers everything from relationships, to career, to arts and culture topics.
Deep thinking; real faith. Two things that far too often fail to appear together.
Best thing of all? It’s only $12 a year. Check out the website here and subscribe now.
Hello. I just wanted to pop in and say hi. I read your article in Converge magazine and liked it so much I came looking for your blog so I can subscribe. Thanks and keep up the good work.
Cheers,
Glad you enjoyed it Danica. Be sure to keep your eye on Converge! They’ve asked me to write another article for them (probably to appear two issues from now).
Matt,
Thanks for representing a “different” perspective on the discussion of masculinity. As a leader of men your comments forced me to think about how we often appeal to the powerful picture of a warrior to engage men in the adventure of Christianity. I too wonder if we are simply appealing to the sin nature within us at times.
Having said that, I wonder if a better perspective would be to juxtapose “worshiper” with warrior instead of “gardener” This strikes me as a more true characterization of man’s true purpose. True, we were charged with the tasks you sighted in your article. But none so great as the call to “love the Lord your God.”
Additionally, while it might not make for as strong a positional article, I wonder if it is proper to completely dismiss our call to be warriors. John 10:10 makes me want to stand up and fight for my four boys and my wife. All be it through the power of the name of Jesus. Sure I am responding to situation much like the warriors you mention in your article. But in that moment, when the devil and his army rises up against the Lords people, I am called to do battle as a warrior. Not a gardener. Perhaps we need to recognize that we all must grow as men to be as Christ was for the church. Regardless of the spectrum of roles we will have to play.
Christ was much more then one word; be it gardener, warrior, worshiper, etc. My hope is not to define who I should be on the basis one thing i can clearly understand, rather I long to see Christ equip me to be what I do naturally, and what I don’t yet understand.
Thanks for the thoughtful article. I hope my response helps you further your understanding on the issue of masculinity. You certainly have helped me.
Mike
Wow, great article! Thanks for the insight!